Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Results 1 – 126 of 126
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • Historical:Middle Devonian Series
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}} Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    4 KB (626 words) - 20:53, 5 January 2017
  • Middle Devonian Series
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}} Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    5 KB (698 words) - 21:35, 6 January 2017
  • File:C605-Figure-26.jpg
    |File name=C605-Figure-26.jpg |image_no=Figure 26
    (1,573 × 1,782 (285 KB)) - 13:51, 23 August 2023
  • File:C605-Figure-27.jpg
    |File name=C605-Figure-27.jpg |image_no=Figure 27
    (1,418 × 1,307 (196 KB)) - 15:59, 17 August 2023
  • Historical:Devonian System
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}} Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    9 KB (1,405 words) - 20:41, 5 January 2017
  • File:Penn carbondale 4-76.jpg
    |Caption=Figure 4-76. Hand specimen of “blue band.” Photograph 2008 by Scott D. Elrick
    (2,401 × 1,923 (2.04 MB)) - 21:28, 4 January 2021
  • File:C605-Figure-37.jpg
    |File name=C605-Figure-37.jpg |image_no=Figure 37
    (1,535 × 1,872 (579 KB)) - 19:29, 23 August 2023
  • Devonian System
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}} Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    10 KB (1,478 words) - 17:18, 11 January 2017
  • Historical:Caseyville Formation
    Figure P-9.jpg|{{file:Figure P-9.jpg}} Figure P-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3A.jpg}}
    7 KB (1,108 words) - 21:46, 27 January 2017
  • File:Penn carbondale 4-77.jpg
    |Caption=Figure 4-77. The “blue band” at a site where the Herrin Coal is reduced to th
    (2,401 × 2,041 (4.22 MB)) - 21:29, 4 January 2021
  • File:Penn caseyville 2-8.jpg
    Figure 2-8. Photograph of the Pounds Sandstone in Garden of the Gods State Park (S
    (2,201 × 2,002 (4.3 MB)) - 21:37, 24 November 2020
  • Historical:Rapid Member
    Figure D-6.jpg|{{file:Figure D-6.jpg}}
    2 KB (341 words) - 21:50, 6 January 2017
  • Historical:Cedar Valley Limestone
    Figure D-3C.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3C.jpg}} Figure D-3D.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3D.jpg}}
    6 KB (824 words) - 21:39, 6 January 2017
  • Historical:Wapsipinicon Limestone
    Figure D-3C.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3C.jpg}}
    4 KB (561 words) - 22:03, 6 January 2017
  • Historical:Anvil Rock Sandstone Member
    Figure P-13.jpg|{{file:Figure P-13.jpg}}
    3 KB (397 words) - 15:56, 25 January 2017
  • Historical:Absaroka Sequence
    Figure 14.jpg|{{file:Figure 14.jpg}} Figure P-3D.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3D.jpg}}
    3 KB (482 words) - 22:16, 19 January 2017
  • Cedar Valley Limestone
    Figure D-3C.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3C.jpg}} Figure D-3D.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3D.jpg}}
    6 KB (895 words) - 17:24, 11 January 2017
  • Historical:Bailey Limestone
    Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    4 KB (597 words) - 21:23, 9 January 2017
  • Historical:Grand Tower Limestone
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}}
    5 KB (722 words) - 17:33, 9 January 2017
  • Wapsipinicon Limestone
    Figure D-3C.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3C.jpg}}
    5 KB (632 words) - 17:46, 11 January 2017
  • Rapid Member
    Figure D-6.jpg|{{file:Figure D-6.jpg}}
    3 KB (425 words) - 17:33, 11 January 2017
  • Historical:St. Louis Limestone
    Figure M-1B.jpg|{{file:Figure M-1B.jpg}} Figure M-1D.jpg|{{file:Figure M-1D.jpg}}
    3 KB (473 words) - 15:25, 18 January 2017
  • Historical:Argyle Till Member
    ...shown in figure 6, and the spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8.
    2 KB (299 words) - 20:56, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Pennsylvanian System
    Figure P-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3A.jpg}} Figure P-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3B.jpg}}
    24 KB (3,468 words) - 22:19, 19 January 2017
  • Historical:Pennsylvanian Subsystem
    Figure P-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3A.jpg}} Figure P-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3B.jpg}}
    24 KB (3,468 words) - 16:01, 20 January 2017
  • Historical:Capron Till Member
    ...lt or overlying beds. Its spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8. The geographic distribution of the member is shown in figure 6.
    2 KB (318 words) - 22:21, 3 January 2017
  • Pennsylvanian Subsystem
    the idealized sequence shown in figure P-7 is rarely complete, the units that are present have the same relative p Figure P-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3A.jpg}}
    24 KB (3,539 words) - 16:05, 20 January 2017
  • Historical:Cretaceous System
    Figure K-1A.jpg|{{file:Figure K-1A.jpg}} Figure K-1B.jpg|{{file:Figure K-1B.jpg}}
    9 KB (1,278 words) - 18:06, 21 November 2016
  • Historical:Atokan Series
    Figure P-2.jpg|{{file:Figure P-2.jpg}}
    3 KB (399 words) - 18:34, 27 January 2017
  • Absaroka Sequence
    Figure 14.jpg|{{file:Figure 14.jpg}} Figure P-3D.jpg|{{file:Figure P-3D.jpg}}
    4 KB (561 words) - 22:48, 19 January 2017
  • Grand Tower Limestone
    Figure D-3A.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3A.jpg}}
    6 KB (817 words) - 19:34, 22 October 2019
  • Anvil Rock Sandstone Member
    Figure P-13.jpg|{{file:Figure P-13.jpg}}
    4 KB (474 words) - 16:56, 25 January 2017
  • Historical:Morrowan Series
    Figure P-2.jpg|{{file:Figure P-2.jpg}}
    3 KB (460 words) - 21:16, 27 January 2017
  • Historical:Winnebago Formation
    ...the Winnebago to adjacent stratigraphic units is shown diagrammatically in figure 8. ...ic distribution of the formation at the surface is indicated on the map in figure 6.
    5 KB (697 words) - 20:55, 12 January 2017
  • Cretaceous System
    Figure K-1A.jpg|{{file:Figure K-1A.jpg}} Figure K-1B.jpg|{{file:Figure K-1B.jpg}}
    9 KB (1,353 words) - 16:29, 11 January 2017
  • St. Louis Limestone
    Figure M-1B.jpg|{{file:Figure M-1B.jpg}} Figure M-1D.jpg|{{file:Figure M-1D.jpg}}
    4 KB (560 words) - 15:25, 22 October 2019
  • Historical:Kellerville Till Member
    ...in figure 6, and its spatial relationship is indicated diagrammatically in figure 7.
    5 KB (773 words) - 22:14, 3 January 2017
  • Argyle Till Member
    ...shown in figure 6, and the spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8.
    3 KB (349 words) - 21:10, 12 January 2017
  • Bailey Limestone
    Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    6 KB (837 words) - 21:25, 22 October 2019
  • Capron Till Member
    ...lt or overlying beds. Its spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8. The geographic distribution of the member is shown in figure 6.
    3 KB (385 words) - 20:43, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Eau Claire Formation
    Figure C-1C.jpg|{{file:Figure C-1C.jpg}}
    4 KB (541 words) - 21:00, 28 November 2016
  • Historical:Racine Formation
    Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    7 KB (1,052 words) - 20:03, 4 January 2017
  • Historical:St. Peter Sandstone
    Figure O-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure O-2A.jpg}}
    5 KB (746 words) - 16:01, 21 December 2016
  • Historical:Winslow Till Member
    The geographic extent of the Winslow Till Member is shown in figure 6. It is generally less than 20 feet thick.
    2 KB (347 words) - 22:28, 3 January 2017
  • Historical:Plano Silt Member
    Spatial relations of the Plano Silt Member are shown diagrammatically in figure 8.
    2 KB (348 words) - 20:52, 12 January 2017
  • Atokan Series
    Figure P-2.jpg|{{file:Figure P-2.jpg}}
    3 KB (475 words) - 20:09, 27 January 2017
  • Kellerville Till Member
    ...in figure 6, and its spatial relationship is indicated diagrammatically in figure 7.
    6 KB (833 words) - 22:28, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Sterling Till Member
    ...is thinner. The geographic extent of the Sterling Till Member is shown in figure 6.
    3 KB (389 words) - 22:26, 3 January 2017
  • Morrowan Series
    Figure P-2.jpg|{{file:Figure P-2.jpg}}
    4 KB (535 words) - 22:16, 27 January 2017
  • Historical:Esmond Till Member
    ...not more than 20 to 30 feet thick. Its geographic distribution is shown in figure 6.
    2 KB (362 words) - 22:19, 3 January 2017
  • Historical:Ogle Till Member
    ...s less than 20 feet thick. The geographic extent of the member is shown in figure 6.
    3 KB (413 words) - 22:27, 3 January 2017
  • Historical:Silurian System
    Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    13 KB (2,005 words) - 19:56, 4 January 2017
  • Racine Formation
    Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    8 KB (1,128 words) - 18:20, 11 January 2017
  • St. Peter Sandstone
    Figure O-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure O-2A.jpg}}
    6 KB (814 words) - 18:37, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Clore Formation
    ...e is thinned by sub-Degonia channels in many more places than are shown in figure M-48. In several areas, sub-Pennsylvanian channels also cut into the Clore.
    3 KB (417 words) - 20:34, 10 January 2017
  • Historical:Markham Silt Member
    Its spatial relations are shown in figure 8.
    5 KB (755 words) - 15:47, 18 November 2016
  • Historical:Cambrian System
    Figure C-1A.jpg|{{File:Figure C-1A.jpg}} Figure C-1B.jpg|{{File:Figure C-1B.jpg}}
    12 KB (1,723 words) - 15:46, 23 November 2016
  • Eau Claire Formation
    Figure C-1C.jpg|{{file:Figure C-1C.jpg}}
    4 KB (620 words) - 22:57, 11 January 2017
  • Silurian System
    Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    14 KB (2,077 words) - 18:14, 11 January 2017
  • Plano Silt Member
    Spatial relations of the Plano Silt Member are shown diagrammatically in figure 8.
    3 KB (391 words) - 20:51, 12 January 2017
  • Cambrian System
    Figure C-1A.jpg|{{File:Figure C-1A.jpg}} Figure C-1B.jpg|{{File:Figure C-1B.jpg}}
    12 KB (1,792 words) - 20:42, 11 January 2017
  • Historical:Petersburg Silt
    ...in the Glasford Formation. This relationship is shown diagrammatically in figure 7.<br>
    4 KB (520 words) - 22:41, 3 January 2017
  • Historical:Glasford Formation
    ...ically in figure 7, and the geographic extent of the formation is shown in figure 6. It is the formation underlying the loess in most of the area mapped as I
    11 KB (1,564 words) - 22:23, 3 January 2017
  • Winslow Till Member
    The geographic extent of the Winslow Till Member is shown in figure 6. It is generally less than 20 feet thick.
    3 KB (414 words) - 22:03, 12 January 2017
  • Markham Silt Member
    Its spatial relations are shown in figure 8.
    6 KB (818 words) - 21:04, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Meadow Loess Member
    ...ven in tables 4 and 5, its spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8, and radiocarbon dates are listed in table 1. Its character is described
    4 KB (579 words) - 22:20, 3 January 2017
  • Sterling Till Member
    ...is thinner. The geographic extent of the Sterling Till Member is shown in figure 6.
    3 KB (456 words) - 22:01, 12 January 2017
  • Historical:Lee Center Till Member
    the map in figure 6.
    4 KB (599 words) - 07:08, 28 December 2016
  • Unnamed clastic member - Carbondale Formation
    ...ties, Illinois. Across the border in Gibson County, Indiana, Eggert (1994, figure 6) mapped a “fluvial sandstone-filled channel associated with the Survant
    8 KB (1,158 words) - 16:36, 9 February 2022
  • Historical:Kewaunee Formation
    ...me of their unit boundaries are different from those of Lineback et al. In figure 8, we follow Foster and Colman (1991) for lithostratigraphic unit boundarie
    15 KB (2,217 words) - 20:19, 22 December 2016
  • Historical:Chesterian Series
    ...and characteristic (fig. M-4). Several conodont assemblage zones, shown in figure M-25, are useful in differentiating Chesterian rocks (Collinson et al., 197
    7 KB (965 words) - 16:17, 10 January 2017
  • Ogle Till Member
    ...s less than 20 feet thick. The geographic extent of the member is shown in figure 6.
    3 KB (488 words) - 22:08, 12 January 2017
  • Glasford Formation
    ...ically in figure 7, and the geographic extent of the formation is shown in figure 6. It is the formation underlying the loess in most of the area mapped as I
    11 KB (1,623 words) - 21:14, 12 January 2017
  • Bucktown Coal Member
    ...n Nelson of the ISGS logged the core in 2008. As shown on the graphic log (Figure 4-69), the Bucktown is 3.7 ft (1.13 m) thick and occurs in the depth range Direct comparison of the Bucktown reference core (Figure 4-69) with the Briar Hill reference sections (Figures 4-61 and 4-67) demons
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 16:39, 9 February 2022
  • Kewaunee Formation
    ...me of their unit boundaries are different from those of Lineback et al. In figure 8, we follow Foster and Colman (1991) for lithostratigraphic unit boundarie
    15 KB (2,276 words) - 20:48, 22 December 2016
  • Clore Formation
    ...e is thinned by sub-Degonia channels in many more places than are shown in figure M-48. In several areas, sub-Pennsylvanian channels also cut into the Clore.
    4 KB (490 words) - 16:24, 13 January 2017
  • Historical:Banner Formation
    ...c extent of the Banner Formation where it is the surface drift is shown in figure 6, but in the subsurface it is present locally throughout much of western,
    10 KB (1,522 words) - 22:46, 3 January 2017
  • Petersburg Silt
    ...in the Glasford Formation. This relationship is shown diagrammatically in figure 7.<br>
    4 KB (582 words) - 22:31, 12 January 2017
  • Chesterian Series
    ...and characteristic (fig. M-4). Several conodont assemblage zones, shown in figure M-25, are useful in differentiating Chesterian rocks (Collinson et al., 197
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 15:54, 13 January 2017
  • Meadow Loess Member
    ...ven in tables 4 and 5, its spatial relations are shown diagrammatically in figure 8, and radiocarbon dates are listed in table 1. Its character is described
    5 KB (644 words) - 20:41, 12 January 2017
  • Banner Formation
    ...c extent of the Banner Formation where it is the surface drift is shown in figure 6, but in the subsurface it is present locally throughout much of western,
    11 KB (1,578 words) - 22:33, 12 January 2017
  • Seelyville Coal Member
    ...acobson (1987) published a section from the Chinook Mine in the type area (Figure 4-6), but these pits have been backfilled and exposures no longer exist. ...ignated as the principal reference section for the Seelyville Coal Member (Figure 4-7). This hole (IGS ID #115871) was drilled in sec. 2, T 2 S, R 7 
    21 KB (3,132 words) - 16:14, 9 February 2022
  • Houchin Creek Coal Member
    ...y borehole SDH-306, drilled in sec. 2, T 2 S, R 7 W, Pike County, Indiana (Figure 4-7). ...em (Wanless 1957, geologic section 39, p. 204–205) would have served well (Figure 4-43). Unfortunately, Peppers (1970, p. 50) reported that the section Wanle
    13 KB (1,879 words) - 16:37, 9 February 2022
  • Velpen Limestone Member
    ...41.5 to 41.7 m) in this core and directly overlies the Mecca Quarry Shale (Figure 4-7).
    5 KB (719 words) - 16:36, 9 February 2022
  • Survant Coal Member
    ...cause this section was never published, it is reproduced here graphically (Figure 4-30) and verbally (below):<br> ...of the Survant type section in sec. 2, T 2 S, R 7 W, Pike County, Indiana (Figure 4-7). This core exemplifies the Survant Member where its constituent Wheele
    23 KB (3,526 words) - 16:36, 9 February 2022
  • Historical:Loveland Silt
    The spatial relations of the Loveland are shown diagrammatically in figure 7. The silts intercalated with the tills of Illinoian age are separately na
    6 KB (856 words) - 22:23, 3 January 2017
  • Wheeler Coal Member or Bed
    ...ill cores in Iowa have been designated as Swede Hollow reference sections (Figure 4-33). All three cores contain the Wheeler and Bevier coals. Gentile and Th
    8 KB (1,214 words) - 16:36, 9 February 2022
  • Springfield Coal Member
    ...ld Coal is in the depth range 245.6 to 251.5 ft; the base was not reached (Figure 4-56). The hole was drilled into Peabody Coal Company’s Mine No. 59, wher ...apped two large regions of thick Springfield Coal. The map presented here (Figure 4-57) has been modified from Hatch and Affolter (2002). The larger area cov
    16 KB (2,297 words) - 16:14, 9 February 2022
  • Loveland Silt
    The spatial relations of the Loveland are shown diagrammatically in figure 7. The silts intercalated with the tills of Illinoian age are separately na
    6 KB (911 words) - 21:17, 12 January 2017
  • Carbondale Formation
    ...ondale into Kentucky; Cumings (1922) did the same for Indiana. As shown by Figure 4-1, numerous authors adjusted the unit boundaries. Some authors ranked the ...o the Davis Coal, currently considered the basal member of the Carbondale (Figure 4-2). Nonetheless, this is a good reference for the Carbondale in western I
    21 KB (3,121 words) - 16:14, 9 February 2022
  • Francis Creek Shale Member
    ...Adair 7.5' quadrangle. A graphic version of the section is presented here (Figure 4-21). Wanless described the unit as being 39 ft 6 in. (12.0 m) thick and c ...k and occurs in the depth interval from 264.7 to 303.0 ft (80.7 to 92.4 m; Figure 4-22). The core contains abundant plant fossils.
    16 KB (2,366 words) - 16:29, 9 February 2022
  • Hanover Limestone Member
    ...from the type Hanover Limestone. However, another version of the section (Figure 4-46) by Van Pelt and Hendricks shows “maybe 20 to 24 feet” (6 to 7 m) ...r is 0.7 ft (21 cm) thick and lies at 352.0 to 352.7 ft (107.3 to 107.5 m; Figure 4-44). The same core is the reference section for the Houchin Creek Coal an
    12 KB (1,717 words) - 16:17, 9 February 2022
  • Dykersburg Shale Member
    ...sburg to be about 15 ft (4.5 m) thick. A graphic section from field notes (Figure 4-58) shows that the base of the Dykersburg was under water at the time the ...ick and lies at the depth interval of 491.9 to 537.9 ft (149.9 to 164.0 m; Figure 4-59).
    17 KB (2,584 words) - 19:41, 23 August 2023
  • Oak Grove Limestone Member
    The section illustrated here (Figure 4-25) is from Smith et al. (1970, p. 15). This section illustrates the mult ...in the depth interval of 136.2 to 136.8 ft (41.5 to 41.7 m) in this core (Figure 4-7).
    15 KB (2,214 words) - 16:29, 9 February 2022
  • Herrin Coal Member
    ...in the depth interval of 452 ft 2 in. to 458 ft 10 in. (137.8 to 139.9 m; Figure 4-74). ...Within this larger area, the thickest coal borders the Walshville channel (Figure 4-75). Here, the Herrin is thicker than 8 ft (2.4 m) in large areas and loc
    18 KB (2,748 words) - 16:35, 9 February 2022
  • Battery Rock Sandstone Member
    ...comparison of the type and reference sections of the Caseyville Formation (Figure 2-2) raises doubts about the continuity of the unit. The interval between t ...unit labeled “Battery Rock Sandstone” in the type and reference sections (Figure 2-2) actually is the same sandstone, the tectonic subsidence rate must have
    11 KB (1,561 words) - 16:34, 9 February 2022
  • Colchester Coal Member
    ...ea illustrate the relationship of the Colchester Coal to enclosing strata (Figure 4-18). ...0 cm) thick at a depth of 140.6 to 141.6 ft (42.9 to 43.2 m) in this core (Figure 4-19).
    17 KB (2,555 words) - 16:30, 9 February 2022
  • Antioch Limestone Member
    Wier (1961). The section (Figure 4-66) leaves much to be desired because it does not position the Antioch re
    7 KB (940 words) - 16:38, 9 February 2022
  • Davis Coal Member
    ...the entire core; a graphic log of the relevant portion is presented here (Figure 4-13). ...guish this seam from the Dekoven, which lacks overlying radioactive shale (Figure 4-14).
    12 KB (1,795 words) - 16:31, 9 February 2022
  • St. David Limestone Member
    ....7 ft (52 cm) thick and occurs in the depth interval from 51.0 to 52.7 ft (Figure 4-60). This core doubles as the type section of the [[Turner Mine Shale Mem
    9 KB (1,249 words) - 16:16, 9 February 2022
  • Mecca Quarry Shale Member
    ...is 3.8 ft (1.16 m) thick at a depth of 136.8 to 140.6 ft (41.7 to 42.9 m; Figure 4-7).
    11 KB (1,588 words) - 16:29, 9 February 2022
  • Caseyville Formation
    ...s Landing below Battery Rock” in Hardin County, Illinois (Lee 1916, p. 15; Figure 2-1). Lee (1916, p. 15–16) created the original description (Figure 2-2). Kosanke et al. (1960) and Nelson (1989) reproduced the section. Geolo
    54 KB (7,756 words) - 16:31, 9 February 2022
Retrieved from "https://ilstratwiki.web.illinois.edu/wiki/Special:Search"