Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Results 101 – 121 of 235
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  • ...e is thinned by sub-Degonia channels in many more places than are shown in figure M-48. In several areas, sub-Pennsylvanian channels also cut into the Clore.
    4 KB (490 words) - 16:24, 13 January 2017
  • Figure Q-1A.jpg|{{file:Figure Q-1A.jpg}} Figure Q-1B.jpg|{{file:Figure Q-1B.jpg}}
    14 KB (2,141 words) - 16:42, 10 January 2017
  • ...ther of Wisconsinan deposits from northeastern to west-central Illinois by figure Q-8. ...tion of the dominantly till formations and members is shown in figure Q-5. Figure Q-6 shows graphically the historical development of the time-stratigraphic
    15 KB (2,213 words) - 16:41, 10 January 2017
  • .... Van Pelt Jr., and H.R. Wanless (in the ISGS Library), is presented here (Figure 4-40). ...n during deposition of Houchin Creek peat and overlying sediments. Notice (Figure 4-40) that the shale above the Houchin Creek in the Roodhouse area is not t
    6 KB (894 words) - 16:17, 9 February 2022
  • ...and characteristic (fig. M-4). Several conodont assemblage zones, shown in figure M-25, are useful in differentiating Chesterian rocks (Collinson et al., 197
    7 KB (965 words) - 16:17, 10 January 2017
  • ...t 268.0 ft (81.7 m) to the top of the Briar Hill Coal at 323.5 ft (98.6 m; Figure 4-61). Thus, the member is 55.5 ft (16.9 m) thick. ...the Labette Shale in Missouri appears to be correlative to the Big Creek (Figure 4-72).
    7 KB (1,017 words) - 16:15, 9 February 2022
  • Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    14 KB (2,077 words) - 18:14, 11 January 2017
  • ...in the Glasford Formation. This relationship is shown diagrammatically in figure 7.<br>
    4 KB (520 words) - 22:41, 3 January 2017
  • Figure S-2A.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2A.jpg}} Figure S-2B.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2B.jpg}}
    13 KB (2,005 words) - 19:56, 4 January 2017
  • Figure O-2D.jpg|{{file:Figure O-2D.jpg}}
    4 KB (588 words) - 18:06, 12 January 2017
  • Figure O-2D.jpg|{{file:Figure O-2D.jpg}}
    4 KB (585 words) - 18:01, 12 January 2017
  • Figure O-2E.jpg|{{file:Figure O-2E.jpg}}
    4 KB (543 words) - 20:05, 12 January 2017
  • ...The present condition of these exposures is not known. A composite column (Figure 4-9) illustrates the overall relationships. ...(0 to 17 m) thick in Gallatin and Saline Counties, southeastern Illinois (Figure 4-16). The “parting” is largely, but not entirely, sandstone. As mapped
    8 KB (1,087 words) - 16:30, 9 February 2022
  • ...in figure 6, and its spatial relationship is indicated diagrammatically in figure 7.
    6 KB (833 words) - 22:28, 12 January 2017
  • Figure S-2D.jpg|{{file:Figure S-2D.jpg}}
    4 KB (596 words) - 20:21, 11 January 2017
  • Figure D-3B.jpg|{{file:Figure D-3B.jpg}}
    6 KB (837 words) - 21:25, 22 October 2019
  • Figure K-1A.jpg|{{file:Figure K-1A.jpg}}
    4 KB (554 words) - 17:11, 11 January 2017
  • Figure C-1C.jpg|{{file:Figure C-1C.jpg}}
    4 KB (620 words) - 22:57, 11 January 2017
  • Figure C-1D.jpg|{{file:Figure C-1D.jpg}}
    5 KB (653 words) - 22:36, 11 January 2017
  • Figure S-4.jpg|{{file:Figure S-4.jpg}}
    4 KB (585 words) - 20:29, 11 January 2017

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)