Difference between revisions of "File:C605-Figure-20.jpg"

From ILSTRAT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "C592-" to "C605-")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Galatia Channel Image
 
{{Galatia Channel Image
|File name=C592-Figure-20.jpg
+
|File name=C605-Figure-20.jpg
 
|image_no=Figure 20
 
|image_no=Figure 20
 
|caption=Photographs showing Springfield Coal “split” by massive siltstone in the Millennium Mine. The lower view is a close-up of the upper view. Notice the ragged splaying of coal layers into the siltstone from both above and below, with one coal stringer crossing diagonally from the lower to the upper coal “bench.” Combined with the absence of roots beneath the upper “bench,” such geometry implies that the upper part of the peat deposit was rafted.
 
|caption=Photographs showing Springfield Coal “split” by massive siltstone in the Millennium Mine. The lower view is a close-up of the upper view. Notice the ragged splaying of coal layers into the siltstone from both above and below, with one coal stringer crossing diagonally from the lower to the upper coal “bench.” Combined with the absence of roots beneath the upper “bench,” such geometry implies that the upper part of the peat deposit was rafted.

Revision as of 20:11, 10 July 2020

Figure 20 Photographs showing Springfield Coal “split” by massive siltstone in the Millennium Mine. The lower view is a close-up of the upper view. Notice the ragged splaying of coal layers into the siltstone from both above and below, with one coal stringer crossing diagonally from the lower to the upper coal “bench.” Combined with the absence of roots beneath the upper “bench,” such geometry implies that the upper part of the peat deposit was rafted.






File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current15:15, 9 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 15:15, 9 July 20201,800 × 2,200 (1.15 MB)ILSTRAT (talk | contribs)

Metadata